Background
One negative impact that sand mining can have, is
deterioration of roads from the heavy trucks carrying frac sand. For numerous counties, this is a serious
concern as it could lead to higher road maintenance costs. The additional costs to the counties could
potentially be avoided through road upgrade maintenance agreements (RUMA)
between sand mining companies and county governments (Hart, Adams, and Schwartz, 2013)
Figure 1. On the left is shown elements of a good road use agreement
(Hart, Adams, and Schwartz, 2013) |
Goals and Objectives
In this lab, we will perform a network analysis to find the
routes that would be used to transport sand from mines to rail terminals. We will then use this estimation to produce
an estimate of how much counties would have to spend on road maintenance
annually. We will be using theoretical
numbers provided by our professor on how often the roads are used and what the
average cost of a truck driving over a section of road is. Because of this, our results our not intended
to be an accurate representation of actual costs. They are meant to show
the process by which you could use network analysis to generate these
estimates.
Methods
![]() |
Figure 3. Map of locations of Sand Mines and Rail Terminals in Wisconsin. Mines within 1.5 km of rail terminals not shown. |
After enabling Network Analysis, Esri street data was
imported. Then using the Closest
Facility tool we calculated the closest routes from each sand mine to a rail
terminal. The mines were loaded as
incidents and the terminals were loaded as facilities. The resulting routes can
be seen in Figure 4.
![]() |
Figure 4. Map of routes from sand mines to rail terminals derived using network analysis Closest Facility tool |
Our professor gave us the following theoretical information
to use to calculate the annual cost per county that would result from hauling
sand on the roads.
- Assume each sand mine takes 50 truck trips per year to the rail terminal, and that the truck has to return to the sand mine after each trip
- The hypothetical costs per truck mile is 2.2 cents
Model builder was used to organize the tools needed to
perform the spatial and data analysis needed for this calculation. The model can be seen in Figure 5. A description of the process is written in
numbered steps below:
1. Used
Closest Facility tool in Network Analysis to solve for routes. Mines were loaded as incidents and rail
terminals were loaded as facilities
2. The routes were selected and copied into a
geodatabase.
3. The routes were projected in NAD 1983 Wisconsin
TM (Meters) so that distance could be calculated
4. The Intersect tool was used for the routes and the
Wisconsin counties that were in the same projection.
5. A field was added to calculate the distance of
the routes in miles
6. Summary statistics were used to get the sum of
routes in each county
7. A new field was added and calculated to account
for the number of truck trips annually
8. A new field was added and calculated to account
for the cost of these truck trips
Figure 5. Model used to organize tools and estimate the hypothetical annual cost per county |
Results
![]() |
Figure 6. Map showing hypothetical annual costs of road maintenance due to hauling sand in various Wisconsin Counties |
Figure 7. Graph showing hypothetical annual costs of road maintenance due to hauling sand in various Wisconsin Counties |
Discussion
Network analysis is incredibly useful, and can be used to
make smart and efficient choices in transportation. They can also be useful in helping determine
the impact that certain businesses might have on local roadways, and can be
used to make sure that they are held accountable for this.
Model building was also useful in this activity, in that it
helped organize the tools used, and could be used again even if certain
parameters or data was altered. For
instance, it would not be too difficult if we were to receive an updated list
of mine locations, to simply adjust the model for this and run it again. It is a great time saver when you are performing
a series of operations that may need to be run again with new and updated
information.
Conclusion
In this lab we prepared data using queries, we calculated routes using network analysis, and we build a model to derive hypothetical annual road maintenance costs associated with sand mining. We went through the steps that could be used when performing research on the associated costs of sand mining. Actual analysis on these costs are very important for counties who may need to negotiate road upgrade maintenance agreements (RUMA) with sand mining companies.
Sources
Data
Mine Locations: Wisconsin DNR
Railroad Terminals: Federal Railroad Administration
Basemaps: Esri
Streets for Network Analysis: Esri
Wisconsin Counties Feature Class: Trempealeau county geodatabase
Background Information
Hart, M. V., Adams, T., & Schwartz, A. Transportation Impacts of Frac Sand Mining in the MAFC Region: , CFIRE.
No comments:
Post a Comment